nihil architecture blogs

content

Drugs

When I was twelve years old. Some thing happened that changed the course of my life. I began experimenting with drugs. I was never truly aware of their destructive nature. I wasn’t truly aware of what they did, some people told me to use them and I did, foolishly not questioning what their intentions were. I was given when I was twelve a psychotropic drug, a drug whose true functions were at that time, and are at this time not yet understood. No one knows how it works precisely, what is known is that some of the effects on it are in the eyes of psychiatry ‘benificial’, I indeed became less suspicious of people’s motives; together with my general awareness. I slept more, became drowsy all day long, I lost some degree of control of my muscles.

The drug I was given to, and told to to take was respiridone, an atypical antipsychotic medication. A drug that alters the functioning of the human central nervous system, a drug that plays with the delicate balance of dopamine in one’s brain; what dopamine does exactly is il-understood, however what is known is that it’s one of the most significant neurotransmiters to one’s functioning. It’s not just playing with matches, it’s giving a twelve year old child matches and telling him to play with it.

I was never informed of the true nature of this drug, and here I am, about a decade later. I’ve quit it for some years but the side effects are still there, of some side effects I don’t know if the drug caused them. I have tardive dyskenisa, apparently the standard cause of action is to stop or reduce the dosage if one experiences a tinkling feeling in one’s appendages. I was never informed of that, I had involuntary movements in my class room which amused my fellow students there, my teacher was never informed to look out for those. I had now idea what they were, I can’t squeeze a lump of clay now, or open any bottle. I’ve lost the ability to adapt to a regular day-and-night rhythm unless I take sleeping pills but then I never feel rested, it’s as if I didn’t really sleep.  I just get tired on random chaotic moments, some times twice a day, some times once in three days. there’s no pattern in how long I sleep and how long I’m awake. Needless to say it’s hard for me now to ever get a job, if I make an appointment I know there’s a chance I can’t make it because I have to sleep at that point. I also stay conscious while I sleep, I don’t know if it’s caused by the pills or that I had it before, as I remember always waking up as a child if my mother got home as I heard her footsteps outside. But I recall every thing that happened as I ’slept’ when I wake up, conversations I had, any thing, things other people said in another room. Great to sleep through lectures though. But it’s more like just lying down with my eyes closed than truly sleeping.

Well, one can say that it happens, drugs have their side-effects? But it was never my choice to make, in fact, I wasn’t even told of said side effects, in fact, I was twelve. Seriously, people complaining about things like video games and that they watch violent films, read not enoug books, spend too much time on the internet when it’s acceptable to pump a psychotropic drug into their central nervous system whose functioning is hardly understood? I fail to see any reason why this isn’t quite simply child abuse. Especially to make me less suspicous of others? Sounds like a nice Orwellian reality here… the state authorizes people to make them less suspicous, the suspicions to that the order of conformation isn’t perfect must be suppressed of course, thoughtcrime? Or Ritalin, that’s actually simply a milder form of cocaine, it can treat cocain addictions, and Ritalin addictions again can be relieved via cocaine. That’s just given to children in fact. Ritalin hower is pretty much the inverse of Risperidone, both in function and effect. One becomes more observant of their surroundings, one’s speed of thought increases, and if one’s a psychosis-risk it’s best to refrain from it, Risperidone is to treat a psychosis. But how many children are just loaded with Ritalin simply because behaviourily it seems to pay of, with no one caring to exactly how it works and what it damages in the process; the parents being uninformed that it’s just mild cocaine, and certainly the people who get the shit into their system? ‘Say “no” to drugs kids…’ the hypocrisy of it all.

And then people might say ‘the pros outweigh the cons’, the pros to whom? Yeah.. it’s nice as a parent if your child is just suspicious and you cannot have that perfect model child because it questions the motives of visitors, because your child doesn’t go swimming pools or goes with peers to the cinema, what you so want your child to do. You can make yourself believe you want a normal life for your child, but you really just want a normal child, so that the neighbours don’t look strange at you and question your ability to raise it. And for them to stop thinking it, parents simply are praepared to raise them like crap. How many parents ask their chidren when they give them those drugs ‘These drugs are going to change you in these ways, is that what you want? It’s your call.’, it’s not to help the child, it’s for the parents. And indeed, children never asked to be born, disgusting to see that parents happily mentally injure their children just so that the neighbours won’t frown, so that they can have a little child that fits in… seriously… stop deluding yourself that you do it for your child, then you’d stop the moment the child says it doesn’t want to.

Multiculturalism

Kind of like the idea of multiculturalism, this is for a very simple reason.

Dutch food sucks.

Let me introduce you to the finest intricacies of Dutch cuisine:

Aardappelen met Vlees en Groente:

Aardappelen met Vlees en Groente

This quite literaly translates to ‘Patatoes with meat and vegitables’, our naming convention is as creative as our kitchen. If you think this is just præpairing vegitibles, meat and patatoes and putting them on a plate together, you are correct. If you were to ask if any of this has but any seasoning, I am inclined to answer with a negative. A meal fit for a Jewish king in Auswitch, next:

Boerenkool met Worst:

Boerenkool met Worst

Translates to ‘Farmer’s Cabbage with Sausage’, this is just destroying some cabbage to a pulp with some kind of squashing device and then putting a sausage next to it which may optionally, like here,  resemble together some kind of wretched phallic symbol. More often than not, the sausage is just laid next to it. If you were to ask a patriot here if this has but any taste you would get some-thing like ‘Taste in food? How dare you, this is treason to Her Majesty, The Queen, Beatrix of the Netherlands, go away to your own country if you want to eat the derangedness of food which has taste…’, next on we have:

Joods vlees

If you at this point realized that Dutch food is mostly just lumping various articles extracted from nature together which you’ve heated on one plate with no internal cohesion or thought, then you have paid attention. This fine abomination here is another traditional Dutch dish. Now, compare to a random dish brought into this country by some children of Attatürk:

Döner Kebab:

Döner Kebab

Or

Hot Pot, from China:

Hot Pot

Roti, from Suriname:

Surinaamse Roti

I should add that Surinamese Roti is a bit different from the Hindustani one often appreciated in the Anglician world.

I think I’ve made my point quite adequately, and if some Imam does not want to shake the hand of a woman, who cares, I don’t shake hands at all and every-one forgives me because I don’t wear a beard and a turban.

Free software

Politics
,
2009/1/04, 04:26

Richard Stallman, honestly one of the few people that have an en.wikipedia page to whom sincerely look up to and respect for political views and as far as an article there allows one to make a view thereon, also as a person. The way he lives, how what he stands for, his endless quest for perfection in terminology and what he strives to achieve.

He just hasn’t achieved it yet.

Fanboys of  GNU/Linux systems can become a bit obnoxious at time. Yes, GNU/Linux and other UNIX-like Systems serve their purpose and are the best there is in a certain field. A lot of people seem to forget that they don’t work properly in a lot of fields as well. The general ‘Ah good, you use Linux’ or ‘Get Linux’ after receiving a CTCP on IRC are just reaking of noviceness in general, or the people continuing their support for GNU/Linux while they cannot answer the critical questions regarding what exactly makes it better than Mac OS X, they tend to call it ‘Linux’ instead of ‘GNU/Linux’ too. I doubt the operating system would be significantly different if the Kernel was some-thing else too. The significant part of the system is the GNU part. It just doesn’t use Hurd as a kernel. They could try first taking into consideration what exactly the other party does with a machine before automatically assuming GNU/LInux is the best for every-thing, thinking that is just fanboyism. I personally tend to need professional graphics editing and audio editing tools. GNU/Linux doesn’t quite support these, or more like the reverse.

And then people come with ‘open source alternatives’, I just said professional, The GNU Image Manipulation Program is a completely unprofessional tool, it’s a toy to fool around with and desaturate your pictures of some sorts. It by no means meets the demands for a graphics designer, Photoshop 1.0 was better than The GIMP is today. And then people tell you you ‘need to be creative’ and then it becomes quite obvious that they are not graphics artists and when you ask them questions it turned out they didn’t know the capabilities of Photoshop by a vast margin. The people suggesting The GIMP comes close or even equal to Photoshop are extremely novice graphics artist and have very little sense of æsthetics, which probably is what the average GNU/LInux user is. And that’s probably why creative software on the platform is greatly insufficient but other things like CGG, Emacs, and LaTeX are not. And the last one is known for its ‘æsthetics are irrelevant’ policy. Have you ever seen the GNU site or Linux.org? Firepages? W3C.org?

Creative software isn’t really high on the GNU’s priority list I suppose is the cause of this, that, or they  themselves don’t realize the improvements it still requires. In that I have a Vista/Linuxmint dual boot, which isn’t because Windows is any great of an OS, it’s more because of the third party availability of commercial software which is largely simply because of the popularity of the platform. But still, it is how it is. Also, it has to be said that various stable builds of GNU/LInux distributions have bugs in them which would be unacceptable on commercial software, such as that it doesn’t suport turning of your speakers if you plug in your headphones which is a ‘known problem’ on various SUSE versions; that some Ubuntu versions where known to not even install at all on a lot of hardware configutarions, some solved the problem by anally raping your computer with an USB stick while you boot from CD, and no one knew why but it worked in some cases. On the other hand, Windows keeps having the very annoying bug that for instance a .jpg file being put on your drive can run itself as a binary executable in disguise, also known as virus. People that think Mac OS X and Unixen can’t get a virus is because of the obscurity of the software.. errhh. It’s essentially extremely strange that Windows can get virus, it’s a bug that files can just run themselves due to exploits in file-systems and what-not. And it still hasn’t been fixed, I reckon they can fix it. But just think about it, do you know any other things from MacAffee and Norton but virus scanner? I wouldn’t be that surprised if they paypal a huge sum to Bill Gates every year so that Microsoft doesn’t put them out of business by making their OS a little more resiliant against a flue. But ask yourself these questions:

  • Why is an OS good on which generally software you install doesn’t work the way it should unless you google a solution which more often than not requires you to sudo a couple of text files in which an error can cause your box to boom?
  • Why is an OS good which has an extremely limited availability of third party software?
  • Why is an OS good on which bugs such as not being able to install at al or being unable to properly direct hardware is a ‘known feature’ in stable builds?
  • Why is an OS good which requires extremely complicated procedures to get external hardware working like USB flash memory, SD card readers, portal MP3 players, and even if you get it to work it still lacks many features?

Try being objective about Stallman’s dream please. He has far from achieved it yet and the various stables could better be called GNU/Linux beta releases. They aren’t full fledged operating systems as of yet and have too many bugs and support issues for that. But I like the idea and support it, but also try to be realistic and down to earth about the feasibility of providing a good product free of charge and complete insight to company secrets. Though it’d be wonderful if he one day manages to achieve it.

I am by the way against all forms of intellectual property, thither my consistent Creative Commons tags.

« Newer Posts