nihil architecture blogs

• Because when I am out walking during the day, going to a physics conference or simply sit in a restaurant with an old classmate I get copious amounts of text messages; phone-calls asking Why I am not, in fact, on-line.
• Because the cutest and/or nicest girls I encounter seem to be drawn.
• Because my main source of kvlt as fvck black metal is, in fact, my little sister.
• Because I’ve never been drunk in my entire life.
• Because I wasn’t asked any more to join any parties and what-not at physics and maths studies from students after a couple of weeks, whether this is because they don’t want me or because they about realized I was going to decline remains in the grey.
• Because when for some reason one of the most attractive girls you can imagine is interested in me and stands in front of my door step every week a couple of times to proceed to forcibly hug me, when she’s here I usually forcibly destroy every ‘moment’ we have and have technically friend-zoned her.
• Because I fumbled my studies of physics and maths horribly because no one could figure out the gibberish I wrote down on the exams due to unconventional logic, too large logical steps and nonlinear writing style.
• Because my ex claims to hate me for ‘making her dependent of me’ (I still have no idea how I could have prævented that…)
• Because I defend Linkin Park against true metallers brining swift death to false black metal.
• Because of that the only slight resemblance of a role-model I have is a an Asian girl younger than I; secondary school student who never comes out of her house and is highly difficult to communicate with.
• Because I like girls in gothloli dresses.

I realize I said my next post will be about the holocaust again but I’ve come to the conclusion that:

1. You don’t care.
2. I don’t care if you care.
3. Threnody + Care Bears = win.
4. There, I made fun of Japanese people dying whilst the holocaust occurred.
5. One more for the road, say against a Japanese person: ‘You’re mother has cancer because your grandfather still has radioactive shit.’

There, done, now the topic at hand, actually just a post salvaged from a forum, gogogo:

http://www.last.fm/group/lolicon+and+black+ambient

I made that group under my old account about a year back. Forgot about it until I saw that some-one whom I just randomly encountered was a member. The only of the members I directly know there is Xisch, she is awesome, I worship her, shame things never really went any-where with her because she’s just too cold and emotionless. But oh well.

I was also on a lolicon IRC channel for a while. 6 of the 30 regulars there listened to pretty obscure black metal / ambient, things like Paysage d’Hiver, The Ruins of Beverast, Darkspace, Trist and Trancelike Void. This is the kind of stuff 99.9% of a random black metal board probably doesn’t even know it exists, hence ‘black ambient‘, I pretty much loathe black metal as I see it as just another hippie metal form of teens that need to grow up ‘WAAAHH, NORWAYYY m/’, but black ambient borrows more influences from ambient in track lengths, nonlinear structure, soundscapes, even though the tracks might still contain blasts or guitars (not always) it just listens to completely differently, it are soundscapes, not aggressive quasi-thrash. Black ambient is a shitload darker than black metal, which is still enthusiastic shit people jump on at parties in some minor scale while black ambient is often completely discordant in its melodic structure, a feature it borrows from dark ambient, the same with the overall soundscape of the tracks. For some reason though, a lot of people enjoying black ambient seem to be pretty much into lolicon, in fact I haven’t met any that at least don’t admit that it’s cute. The projects are often surrounded by an aura of seriousness and minimal nature. In all but a few cases, the projects don’t really have a ‘biography’, the site of Trist just lists all his releases, some news and a picture of his dog, ahah. (‘my dog is so kind friend’), band pictures, if they exist, are often a blurry figure in a blurry background it’s hard to tell from if it’s even a human let alone recognise facial features, the whole genre is so ridiculously dark, much darker than black metal, much more seriously artistic and less ‘entertainment’ like, at concerts, every-one is expected to be quiet and behave and I heard some guys got kicked out of a Darkspace concert for head-banging, ahahah. But they are all so damn lolicon, ahaha. The creative drive behind Trancelike Void works as a primary school teacher, Trancelike Void is some pretty bleak and repetitive stuff. But it also has tracks called ‘Daydream’ on an album ‘Destroying Something Beautiful’, or Trist with an album which Translates from Czech to ‘Suicidal Angels’, regardless of being highly depressed music, it still sounds cute and ’sweet’ at every point.

Even further than that this Dutch præsenter of mainly shows catered towards children’s education is actually an ideal of beauty there. Also, they like J-rock often, and things like The Birthday Massacre which ‘black metal’ people would probably flame as being ‘gay emo shit’ (which it isn’t). I have a black ambient project, æon nought, which is extremely bleak stuff, my album ‘Opus IV: Twilight / Mind’ contains two tracks of around 40 minutes, extremely monotonous, I am not afraid to repeat the same 16 measure melody for about ten minutes against uncompromising blasts with very little variation in the blasts and some screams at some points to also let in end in 16 minutes of night static sewer like ambience. And then I have another project called Lajlia, which is extremely.. dreamy. It’s nostalgic, track titles like ‘Stars so Bright’, ‘Friends Others Can’t See’, ‘Dressed in White, Smiling’, ‘I’ll Hate The World for You, Just Stay Innocent” and these tracks pretty much express their titles, as I hardly ever use lyrics… and if you look at the similar artists on last.fm…?

It doesn’t sound any-thing like that. They probably got to know it by just getting to know æon nought or emotion.i:void or some other project I have (I have about six solo projects, four projects by which I collaborate, a shit load of joke bands, a lot of discontinued projects..), I know, but they like it… my mother likes Lajlia… any black metal kid would just say ‘Gay.. emo shit.. gay.. not tr00.. betrayed the black metal scene…’

My sister once got crying after she read some posts of mine on a board, quite similar to what I post here if my post contain the word ‘human’ or ‘your species’ every two lines at least. She said she couldn’t understand that I wrote such things like ‘If you brutally slaughter 5000 random people the chance that there is 1 person therein who’s worth to spare is nihil.’, she knows me as about the kindest person in the world. Kris said the same, every-one of my few friends say that about me. I say that about some other people too whom I have seen writing similar things on boards. I know I wouldn’t be outside the odd night on some field screaming and hurting myself and cursing humanity if you could just fucking behave for a change. If you didn’t punish Turing for liking men and in all hypocrisy look down on that as hideous but in the same fucking country do the exact same thing again by punishing some guy who had a relationship with someone apparently to young. While the girl was crying at the judge that she loved him and she couldn’t just do that. With the judge having the supreme arrogance to just think ‘I know better than you what’s good for you even though I don’t know you little girl.’, or, again in Britain some-one getting punishment for fucking a bicycle based on ‘gross indecency’. The same law by which Wilde and Turing, some of Britain’s finest in their field’s lives were eventually ruined. Which they now all look back on as horrible? Yeah, if you weren’t like that, then I probably wouldn’t be that hateful. I don’t hate my sister, I love my sister, I hate my entire family but I love my sister. She’s not extremely smart or some-thing, she doesn’t understand maths or science, she listens to cheesy music but she would never with whatever power she might have to do it impose her own taste upon others, limit the freedom and personal choices of others like the examples I described there. And continue doing so like in the institute while I demonstrated they used a circular reasoning, and they were still convinced of that which they only believed due to a Pavlovian conditioning…

Those black metal kiddies will all grow out of their childish ‘NORWAY!!! BRUTAL!!’ phase and settle down and have a calm life in the end. Stuff like Lajlia, Every Little Thing, The Birthday Massacre and shit is probably what they would have listened were it not for you idiots. My musical output is 65% on æon nought alone I think simply because I usually feel like that, æon nought is probably my bleakest project and also the most inaccessible. My sister is about the most kindhearted person on the planet, always calm and like so. Kris is too… just dresses in too large woollen sweaters and skirts and has an extremely ‘tender’ face to which some other guy ‘in the scene’ said ‘Hmm, good catch, sir.’, his girlfriend looks very shy, cute and kind, and I’m sure he is like that to her too, regardless of the furious things I have seen him write on fora. I guess she’s openminded, though not that kvlt, apparently eighties rock which he intends to not contaminate he says.

Discuss:

On a rather dubious site, I was entering ‘debate’ with some-one who was apparently a linguist, not only that, but also a linguist who not only claimed that a spelling standard regulated by an official body was ‘descriptive linguistics’, but also a spelling standard which differentiated two words which were phonetically equal as much as phonemically and simply spelt differently per etymology, which is also a regular process of a lot of similar couples in the language we spoke of, and also a spelling standard which is most notoriously wrongly applied even by adults in spoken of language, even after many months she still claims it’s descriptive linguistics with absurd arguments, also, she doesn’t like me. I’m talking about the ‘dt-rule’ in Dutch by the way. If you are a linguist, please tell her she sucks (cataclysm__child at hotm4il dot common extention) with my compliments. In fact, you don’t have to be a linguist, any-one who know the definition of ‘descriptive linguistics’ can just mail her and argue why she’s wrong, I’m against the argument of authority.

However that is completely irrelevant to the article actually and I’ll leave in the middle if I just wrote it as an excuse to rant on Nele, which actually is a pretty beautiful name I would name my daughter like that. The point is I had a debate with her which started about creationism and then ventured into scientific rigour. She continually accused me of not ‘understanding’ philosophy as I attacked Captain Moustache on flaws in reasoning like you’d never seen it. What also happened was that she said some things about the imperfection of maths such as ‘Mathematics has unproven theorems’.. yeah. That was the first thing she said. So I simply assumed she applied some terms wrongly, that’s a contradictio in terminis I fear, you can only call a statement a theorem after it’s proven, that’s the definition of a theorem. So I pointed that out and asked what she meant to get back not only some-thing which indicated that she just read a dubious article about it and didn’t understand shit what she was talking about. But also some clear errors she made which I pointed out. That’s the vital difference, I pointed out her errors, I could point them out and then I claimed she didn’t know or understand the process behind mathematical reasoning at all and suggested she stop talking about it as she made a complete fool of herself. How-ever after asking a lot of times ‘Yes, what am I misunderstanding about philosophy then, where do I err?’ she couldn’t give me any concrete examples, she just kept claiming I didn’t understand it regardless of that she couldn’t extract an error in reasoning or some factual data I stated wrongly about the subject.

Which sadly happens rather often. That people insist you are ‘wrong’ without them being able to show the point where you are wrong, which is just annoying. The same thing happens a lot of times in art. ‘You don’t understand art.’ How could you ‘understand’ art in the first place? You could agree with people who think they understand it, that’s as close as you can get. It’s a sum of opinions, studying art and having discourse about it. Same with continental philosphy like Nietzsche, I mean, come on, it’s formally just popular literature he wrote. He wrote it for laymen to read, people with no education in any scientific field ought to be able to understand it assuming ‘common knowledge’ as prærequisits and therefrom it is popular literature by definition. How people think of themselves as ‘intelectual’ by reading that or Nietzch is called a ‘thinker’ is beyond me.

This article sucks, next time a good old holocaust post, now go tell Nele why she’s wrong with my compliments, don’t just tell her she sucks, give arguments. Nahh, just forgot about it, I’ve given all the arguments I can, repeating an argument doesn’t make it more valid, no argumentanda ad nauseam please.

All right, I am fully conscious of the fact that from the perspective of my mother what happened was that she got a præsent for me, I asked a question about why she thought I liked it and she got back when she had just finished her sentence out of no-where. “FUCK YOU, DIE BITCH, YOUR KIND BURNT BRUNO AND KILLED TURING, FUCK OFF, GET OUT OF MY ROOM AND TAKE YOUR WHOLE DISGUSTING SPECIES WITH YOU.”

What happened was that she came home with ‘I’ve bought some-thing for you you’ll like?’, ‘Hmm, what?’, ‘Black cushions.’(*), ‘Hmm, why would I need those, I already have cushions?’, ‘Well, you like black.’ (**) At (*) I already thought ‘30 seconds and I’ll explode, probably. At (**) I did, I tend to ask questions before exploding no matter how obvious a situation is before getting angry, realizing that I cannot know what I overlook as the last human on earth.

Point being, this is probably the seventh time I told my mother I do not like ‘black’, repeating things isn’t that annoying. I’m more annoyed by the reason she thinks I do. In her world, I apparently wear  ‘a lot of black clothes’, which I may do 60% of the time, I also wear a lot of white and grey clothes. I’m more interested into why for instance she has to this day failed to notice I always wear plain clothes or simple design, or that I always wear discrete cloths in that I always have long trousers and longsleeve shirts / hooded sweaters even in the summer, or that my clothes are also several sizes too large (belts for the win), for some reason, of all those things, the black colour is the only thing which has captured her attention, which isn’t even omnipræsent like all the others I mentioned.

Naturally this is to accumulate to her collection of stereotype images of her own son. A chap with long hair and a psychotic depression in early adulthood who then according to her own vision of the world shall then dress in ‘black’. The same happened at the university when I was asked what kind of music I listened to with me replying ‘ambient’ to get back ‘Ahh, Slipknot or some-thing?’ to just say back ‘Almost, except completely different, kind of like you and some-one with a brain.’, if he already knew for himself what kind of music I listened to, why ask? I personally can’t stand those teenagers who idolize ‘black’, listen to ‘metal’ and are blatantly savage and having the time of their lives on concerts whilst jumping around with their friends who at the same time often claim to be ‘depressed’ and ‘hateful’ or some-thing like that. From my own world, they are closer to my mother than to me in the sense of that they are also guilty of stereotype imaging.

What people also forget to realize is the nature of the in-group bias. Members from an external group appear as more alike than members from your own group, I shall pertain no fake modesty to that I’ve throughout my life have been let completely unaffected or at least that little that it becomes irrelevant by this human behaviour. I remember that on an electronic music board, some-one got annoyed by that people can’t understand the difference between trance and techno and claim it is all the same, an annoyance I share, they are nothing alike. However the right of that person to be angry by that was voided when a day or so later he said that R&B and Hiphop were all the same… small slip maybe? No, because as I pointed out his hypocrisy, he kept claiming that they really are the same while trance and techno aren’t and it are just marketing terms in the former case lest a genuine distinction in the latter… human behaviour, textbook example.

The true hypocrisy lies in that in some forms, this behaviour is all but universal, and in others even illegal. To say that ‘all foreigners’ are just the same is pretty much evil here, and if it comes from a government official that person would ultimately have to resign. Some-thing I have attended my mother to earlier on such an occurrence, especially when she got angry when some-one thought that Moroccans have a higher crime rate in this country, that would also mean that people of Indian descent have a higher crime rate like my mother. Saying that Moroccans have a higher crime rate is  as much a fallacy in debate by the way, as ‘Moroccans’ are just as much a group which we can divide into ‘Moroccans that work at a bakery’ and ‘Moroccans that work as a lawyer’ and those again and again. The only argument you can put forth comes to the individual ‘You have done a crime.’ is an argument. A simple reductio ad absurdum to show you cannot use ‘groups’ in this sort of argument is:

Be x a random human. Now construct a ‘group’ A consisting of x and y where y is a serial killer. We now have a correlation of group A in crime rates (which is absurdly high) as x is in group A. x is more dangerous. We now have established that every human is more dangerous than average… contradiction by the definition of average. Q.E.D.

Which so perfectly shows the problem with stereotypical imagery. How to construct group A. The point is that we may construct A in every way we like. But people are naturally inclined to group certain things together and others not, for no real reason. My mother is inclined to group people who wear black together versus those who don’t. Thence came her stereotype imagery.

Stem cell research, completely against it as I’m pro-life. I feel that dead life is sacred, however killing people by sheer approval of six or so random AMERICANS® being pulled from the street completely lay at law and AMERICAN® justice is of course perfectly okay. This is because I am pro-life, hence I support the war on terror, staying in Iraq because I am pro-life, because all life is sacred and can never be terminated, man do I love ALL AMERICAN® barbecues with lots of AMERICAN® meat. Euthanasia is a disgrace because I am pro-life and only the AMERICAN® GOD® may decide when life ends, now let’s drill some polar beers away from our AMERICAN® resources, yeah.

Also, I’m against same sex marriage in AMERICA® as it compromises the sanctity of marriage in OUR NATION UNDER GOD® as envisioned by the FOUNDING FATHERS® about FREEDOM® and equality. Marriage is an act of love and TAX CUTS® between one man and one woman, PERIOD®.

Atheists are scary people who don’t believe in GOD®. It’s common sense and evident that the world is created by GOD® in all its beauty…ful resources we can extract from it with HUGE® drill towers which make it even more beautiful. Naturally, as the world is created by GOD® in AMERICAN® perfection and global warming is not caused by AMERICANS® and non American-humans it is perfect that it happens as GOD® intends and we must not do any-thing about it, especially if it compromises our AMERICAN® ECONOMY®, also, GOD® loves us and is a really really really really really righteous guy in the AMERICAN WAY®

Vote niarch for president, the first openly pansexual, lolicon, unmarried, agnostic Chinese/Dutch/Indian/Hindi/Native-American/African president.

1: Linkin Park

Quite so, this band is superb, one of the most prominent example of some-thing hated just for being popular, Tiësto sucks, Nightwish sucks, Dimmu Borgir sucks, but these are excellent. The music is very emotional and not just senseless metal with “”emotional”" lyrics. Also, the music is—in fact—composed. A rarety in today’s music where ‘true metal’ bullshit bands like Slayer and Metallica, besides having extremely corny names, just try out random shit until they have some-thing that sounds good, this music is obviously made with a theme in mind. The production is very haunting and well done, the songs have a very good structure. Also, the rapper in this outlet can actually rap better than the overwhelmingly vast bulk of the ‘yeah.. yeah.. niggers’-rappers in the charts nowadays. In league with guys like Immortal Technique, actual rap, not toned down hiphop which borders on house music. The band also seems to have some degree of knowledge on art seeing from the themes they address in their lyrics and clips, the latter of which are often amazing in composition. It’s sound-track music, which explains the vast portion of Linkin Ball Z AMV’s. These guys are probably nerds any-way.

2: Kawaii

Cute, cute, cute decadence from Japan, I have to say I love it. Brainless anime series like Kodomo no Jikan with cute little girls. Cute here, cute there, cute everywhere. Even lolicon

How I miss my old job before chaos came
My people and my old good life
Frankly I can’t care whom I’m supposed to blame
For that they are no longer still alive

The camps, the sight, my history
It all fades into timeless grey
Just thinking about the misery
I caused the Jews takes just a little bit of pain away

The rotten Jews, the niggers and the ill
Killing them in rightful glory was what my people should fulfil
But yet alas, our leader dead, our country then in disarray
Now all I do is rape my daughter anally, it seems the only way

To just take a little Jewgaynigger-caused pain a tiny bit away

What I mostly encounter on the vast new world of unlimited uppertunities under God that is the internet in the debate about evolution is this:

• People who believe in God and believe that in science, ‘theory’ means ‘not yet proven’
• People who are atheist and consider the nonexistence of any ‘god’ to be proven, also evolution.

Both sides are redundantly stupid and the latter one often LOL biologists LOL. Let there be no mistake about it, the occurence of evolution is scientifically proven beyond all resonable doubt, the evidene is overwhelming and if you cannot see this you simply don’t want evolution to be there. We have fosiles, we have documentation in fosiles of life slowly changing from how it was 40 000 000 years back to how it  is now. We have fosiles documenting man evolving. We have fosiles of dinosaurs evolving into Birds, and please, do not say there aren’t any ‘missing links’. That’s bullshit, evolution is continious, it continious evolving, every species found is a link between the former and the next, we are a link between the homo ergaster and what may come after us. We have observer bacteria evolving in the lab into new species so don’t come with that ‘micro-evolution’ versus ‘macro-evolution’ crap.

However, atheist biologists. still. fucking. suck.

Arguments thereto are so enourmously simple. Their inability at coherent logic is saddeningly vast. Atheism for instance, they have argued thereto with the same amount of absurdity we often see from Young Earth Creationism against the age of the earth. Some simple arguments I have seen:

I have no reason to believe a god exists, therefore I don’t believe a god exists.

Logically fallacy, reduced to the absurd by: ‘I have no reason to believe all the specific people I’ve never met exist, therefore I don’t believe they exist.’ next:

Russell’s teapot shows no god exists and it’s random to assume it does.

False, Russell’s teapot says this: ‘If I were to point at a specific place in space and tell you there is a teapot there with no way for you to check that place, would you say there was a teapot there? If no, why say the same about God, it goes against occam’s razor.’, the difference being is that this shows the unlikeliness of the Abrahamic monotheistic God to exist, quite true, however for it to show that no god exists we would need a formulation of: ‘If I were to point at a all random places in space and tell you there is ‘any-thing’ there with no way for you to check those places, would you say there was ‘no-thing’ at any of those places where ‘any-thing’ is for your imagination to decide. If no, why say the same about any gods?’, this makes it a tad more complicated to overrule I hope.

Creationism is proven false in science.

Nonsense, Young Earth Creationism is contradictory to modern scientific consensus, creationism isn’t, in fact, creationism is currently independent of the modern physical framework. For fucks sake, I have to continue explaining to theists that Creationism and science aren’t contradictory, but Young Earth Creationism and science are. In fact, Creationism solves a great deal of puzzles, but those can also be solved of course by the multiverse hypothesis, and neither can we prove false or true at the moment. How could we, we can’t look before the big bang of course, we can’t say if the big bang was ’started’ by some intelligent force who devised all almost perfect laws of physics for complex structures to occur. Or it’s just so that this universe by sheer chance allows it because there are countless more in which they don’t occur combined with the anthropic principle. Biologists oft.. always think that the multiverse combined with the anthropic principle is more ’scientific’ as it has an ‘aurora of scientificness’ around it, this is is complete nonsense.

It’s important to realize though that we can’t speak of ‘before the big bang’, this is what a lot of people get wrong about the concept, that there used to be a certain long time of silence in a large void and then, BAM. Not quite, there was no time before the big bang, that’s the zeropoint of time. The universe started with a bang. It isn’t that ’some-thing came from no-thing’, ‘every-thing’ simply started in one point and then banged.

Obviously Young Earth Creationists are blind, but the same can often be said about biologists in the vein of Dawkins, they aren’t ’scientific’ in the sense that they also true to prove right a certain thing, they’re not trying to investigate what’s true, they have their minds made up and then try to prove it right. However what they try to prove right has an ‘aurora of scientificness’ around it, making Dawkins appear attractively British-the end.

Definition: Blasphemy. The act of stating an opinion extremely little people agree with in your sphære.

Annō 1327, people tended to get burnt at the stake for being blasphemous. Saying unthinkable things like that the earth wasn’t the centre of the universe or that The Roman Catholic Church wasn’t badarse or perhaps that the pope had an affair with his mistress to name some things. How right or wrong these people might have been, no difference it made for they were blasphemous, they went against what every-one thought, a crime in itself, punished for that they were rightfully, often in name of Our Father Which beth in heaven, hallowed be His name. Justice was forced unto them, these hounds. Luckily that barbarian shit doesn’t happen any-more though…

Think. Again.

It happens alright, and not just in some middle-eastern client state. It happens in the west in no uncertain terms, point being is that people tend to not notice it when they themselves are the inquisition here. Every-day example: ‘Kid says of a guest of his mummy that that guest dresses like a whore after watching too much MTV, kid gets punished. The end, and rightfully so indeed.’, is there any argument the mother can give for that such behaviour cannot come to pass than simply ‘It cannot.’, does the mother even realize the only reason she thinks such behaviour may not occur is because her mother also conditioned her via equal ways of that it’s ‘wrong’, it’s a vicious circle of conditioning here in Pavlovian manners, punish a child when-ever it does some-thing, can be any-thing. And the child will then perceive that as wrong. If I randomly decide to punish my children every time they don’t hate Jews, they will grow up hating them and also telling their children to do the same, simple example being the Westboro Baptist Church of course of that this indeed works, it’s a reason it’s a family. That’s were all your vaunted morals you believe in come from, from being conditioned as a child. And then you have people saying ‘But yes, these are the right morals’…

……….

What the deus? How can it happen that so many humans put forth that argument? Of course they just think those morals are ‘right’ because they are conditioned therein, there is no such as ‘right morals’… Westborans think the same of their own morals, every-one thinks that around the globe no matter how diverse they are just because they are brought up (read: conditioned) with them, you’re extremely arrogant as a human to just think yours are ‘right’ without being able to provide an argument thereto.

Racism, we all hate it, if a person in this country just says ‘I think black people are inferior’ with no arguments given, that person is pretty evil. What does that person actually say any-way…

For sake of argument we here take two of the most vauntedly overrated, ignorantly fabled renaissance artworks. The Mona Lisa of Leonardo, and the David of Michelangelo, almost as fabled as the ninzyatô of Leonardo and the nuntyaku of Michelangelo respectively. Let us say I consider the Mona Lisa ’superior’ because of its better realism to the David because it’s just pompous and undeniably homosexual, probably even liking diphallic men.. that’s just my opinion then on what I value in art. In fact, saying one thing is superior to an-other always is nothing more than simply stating what qualities in things you think matter. Now, because some people consider the Mona Lisa better, and some the David better, and the largest portion the ninzyatô better, I can get away with this. Namely, it is not blasphemy because I don’t disagree with every-one.

Saying ‘black people are inferior’ is little more than stating you think white skin colour is extremely important a quality of people, that’s your opinion then, free to choose what you value in people I daresay. But no one thinks that and then you have formally performed blasphemy, and punished you shall be thereon. If you say you consider tall people to be ’superior’ that has a lot more sympathy to just state, as you’re not disagreeing with every-one. Saying men are superior is again blasphemy as hardly any person thinks gender is significant a quality to judge people on. It’s clearly shown throughout history, when every-one thought indeed that black people were inferior, you performed blasphemy by denying it and were put to justice appropriately. As the ballance shifted in the renaissance stupid white men of either side were not put to justice but respected in their opinion as none of them performed blasphemy, however now the balance has completely flipped and it’s again blasphemy to say black people are inferior you shall be punished for performing blasphemy, as always.

Moralists…

Originally written on last.fm, to be viewed in original context [here].

1: I myself am vehemently against common racism.
2: This is formally criticism on this very last.fm group.

All right, if one looks at the intro of that group, we see their stance against racism. Only at no single point do they argue why racism is ‘bad’, it’s a self-evident truth for them. This is how most people think, in fact, laws are made upon it, and never has any person tried to argue why racism is ‘bad’. It’s just a self-evident truth no one dares to question in western society.

You get in trouble in this country for racist outlets in public, and no one takes the effort of arguing nor explaining why racism is a ‘bad’ think. This is just the same as the inquisition, blasphemy about God in inherently bad and you will be punished for it and arguments to why it’s bad we will not give, it’s just not-done.

Of course we are inclined to believe that racism is inherently ‘bad’, just as the inquisition was inclined to believe blasphemy was inherently ‘bad’, and just as people were inclined to believe without arguments that letting women vote is inherently bad. And just as people have believed videogames are bad for children which has now shown to not be true. Or more recently, how RSI is caused which turns out to be unrelated to how much time you spend behind the computer, people just assumed it without arguments… can we for once learn from our past mistakes?

No, we can’t. That’s the problem with humanity, it’s inability to learn from past mistakes which are in a trendy new coat and thereto different from the untrained eye, but in fact of a logically equivalent form. Every-time people will say ‘It’s different now.’ and not being able to argue why. Now I hope you realize the inquisition felt when they burnt people at the stake which you find hard to comprehend why probably. They felt exactly about how you feel what should happen to Nazis, and said Nazis feel the same as the people burnt at the stake, misunderstood, there isn’t listened to them, people assume they are wrong from the moment on they say they are Nazi.

Of course, it’s true a large deal the things Nazi say simple aren’t true from a scientific perspective, of course the holocaust happened, thereto can be argued. Of course being black isn’t infectious or some-thing, thereto we can argue. However when they say black people are ‘inferior’, that is strictly an opinion. It’s like attacking some-one on that said person doesn’t like the Mona Lisa as much as the David and you like them in reverse order.. really, what race is better is a personal opinion. Also, as a quick reminder. We can logically argue to that the concept of ’species’ cannot exist via the reductio ad absurdum. And biology still desperately holds on to it.. Also, denying the holocaust is über bad while the majority of the world still doesn’t believe in evolution? Get real.. we have more urgent matters at hand.

Also, a lot of time, scientific truth is withheld for the sake of it appearing racist. Yes, there are genetic differences in the averages of capabilities of races. Yes, Asians are genetically smarter than all the other races, and yes, African races have the most physical endurance/stamina. This has long been shown by good, reproducible scientific investigations. In fact, it would be highly unlikely that there wouldn’t be a correlation in races with abilities on about every point, we are free to acknowledge some dog breeds are simply better fit for running courses but not this? Come one, there would be a complex system which has a unstable property which would be in equilibrium if all races were alike on all capabilities. That’s comparable to dropping a cone from a skyscraper in heavy wind. Watching it make hundreds of twists and have it fall on the street on its tip and stay in balance.

However, we must take importance in that we cannot calculate the mechanisms behind why some races outdo others in certain fields. We cannot predict a complex system. It’s chaos theory, we can’t calculate if we drop a cone to which side it will fall. We can measure to which side it falls if we stand on the bottom of the scraper.

But, I’m against judging people on races because it’s a correlation, not an absolute scale. And the problem people have in this is that they tend to classify people into three categories subconsciously: Race, Gender, Age. It’s extremely obvious, all laws are based on it. Even positive discrimination, like the effort of getting as much females as males into high positions. Because people immediately notice if some-one is male or female, and not for instance length.. people in high positions are averagely taller… but people don’t classify in length, so no laws are made to get the mean people in high positions on average length. People class in races, we can put forth a thousand of classes in which correlations emerge, why pick race specifically of all? People think in races subconsciously.. that while races is a continuous scale even, just like species.

This journal has been submitted to the group, I hope they can take some criticism and allow it.