nihil architecture blogs

content

Drugs

When I was twelve years old. Some thing happened that changed the course of my life. I began experimenting with drugs. I was never truly aware of their destructive nature. I wasn’t truly aware of what they did, some people told me to use them and I did, foolishly not questioning what their intentions were. I was given when I was twelve a psychotropic drug, a drug whose true functions were at that time, and are at this time not yet understood. No one knows how it works precisely, what is known is that some of the effects on it are in the eyes of psychiatry ‘benificial’, I indeed became less suspicious of people’s motives; together with my general awareness. I slept more, became drowsy all day long, I lost some degree of control of my muscles.

The drug I was given to, and told to to take was respiridone, an atypical antipsychotic medication. A drug that alters the functioning of the human central nervous system, a drug that plays with the delicate balance of dopamine in one’s brain; what dopamine does exactly is il-understood, however what is known is that it’s one of the most significant neurotransmiters to one’s functioning. It’s not just playing with matches, it’s giving a twelve year old child matches and telling him to play with it.

I was never informed of the true nature of this drug, and here I am, about a decade later. I’ve quit it for some years but the side effects are still there, of some side effects I don’t know if the drug caused them. I have tardive dyskenisa, apparently the standard cause of action is to stop or reduce the dosage if one experiences a tinkling feeling in one’s appendages. I was never informed of that, I had involuntary movements in my class room which amused my fellow students there, my teacher was never informed to look out for those. I had now idea what they were, I can’t squeeze a lump of clay now, or open any bottle. I’ve lost the ability to adapt to a regular day-and-night rhythm unless I take sleeping pills but then I never feel rested, it’s as if I didn’t really sleep.  I just get tired on random chaotic moments, some times twice a day, some times once in three days. there’s no pattern in how long I sleep and how long I’m awake. Needless to say it’s hard for me now to ever get a job, if I make an appointment I know there’s a chance I can’t make it because I have to sleep at that point. I also stay conscious while I sleep, I don’t know if it’s caused by the pills or that I had it before, as I remember always waking up as a child if my mother got home as I heard her footsteps outside. But I recall every thing that happened as I ’slept’ when I wake up, conversations I had, any thing, things other people said in another room. Great to sleep through lectures though. But it’s more like just lying down with my eyes closed than truly sleeping.

Well, one can say that it happens, drugs have their side-effects? But it was never my choice to make, in fact, I wasn’t even told of said side effects, in fact, I was twelve. Seriously, people complaining about things like video games and that they watch violent films, read not enoug books, spend too much time on the internet when it’s acceptable to pump a psychotropic drug into their central nervous system whose functioning is hardly understood? I fail to see any reason why this isn’t quite simply child abuse. Especially to make me less suspicous of others? Sounds like a nice Orwellian reality here… the state authorizes people to make them less suspicous, the suspicions to that the order of conformation isn’t perfect must be suppressed of course, thoughtcrime? Or Ritalin, that’s actually simply a milder form of cocaine, it can treat cocain addictions, and Ritalin addictions again can be relieved via cocaine. That’s just given to children in fact. Ritalin hower is pretty much the inverse of Risperidone, both in function and effect. One becomes more observant of their surroundings, one’s speed of thought increases, and if one’s a psychosis-risk it’s best to refrain from it, Risperidone is to treat a psychosis. But how many children are just loaded with Ritalin simply because behaviourily it seems to pay of, with no one caring to exactly how it works and what it damages in the process; the parents being uninformed that it’s just mild cocaine, and certainly the people who get the shit into their system? ‘Say “no” to drugs kids…’ the hypocrisy of it all.

And then people might say ‘the pros outweigh the cons’, the pros to whom? Yeah.. it’s nice as a parent if your child is just suspicious and you cannot have that perfect model child because it questions the motives of visitors, because your child doesn’t go swimming pools or goes with peers to the cinema, what you so want your child to do. You can make yourself believe you want a normal life for your child, but you really just want a normal child, so that the neighbours don’t look strange at you and question your ability to raise it. And for them to stop thinking it, parents simply are praepared to raise them like crap. How many parents ask their chidren when they give them those drugs ‘These drugs are going to change you in these ways, is that what you want? It’s your call.’, it’s not to help the child, it’s for the parents. And indeed, children never asked to be born, disgusting to see that parents happily mentally injure their children just so that the neighbours won’t frown, so that they can have a little child that fits in… seriously… stop deluding yourself that you do it for your child, then you’d stop the moment the child says it doesn’t want to.

Intellectual property broken down into essential parts

Salvaged forum post:
——————————————

Okay, one of the things people need to realize is what a DVD really is. Or any thing like a CD or whatever.

It’s a formula a computer reads in which tells the computer how to generate the anime. The anime itself is light coming from your screen okay? Same with music, music is vibration in the air; a CD is simply a formula which tells your player how to generate that air vibration.

Of course, shit can’t come from nothing, so what does your computer use as raw resources to construct it? Power, yap, power. Power you simply pay your bill for.

So what’s happening is the equivalent of this:

- You find a recipe on the internet for some kind of expensive type of bread.
- You use that recipe to make that bread from your own resources. For personal use.
- You don’t buy the bread any more at the exclusive store.

And tell me, does any one here frown upon people that don’t go to McDonald but make their own McWhatever rom some recipe they found on the internet. Or have a machine that can do it based on that recipe? Because it’s almost machine like in McDonalds. Especially if all McDonald’s really did was just sell you the recipe to your machine and expect you to make it according to that?

Because concerts are the equivalent of going out to eat in McDonald’s. The Equivalent of buying a CD is buying a recipe from McDonald’s and have some machine that makes the food from it from your own resources.

Children and parents

society

2009/6/14, 13:46

Al right, I stumbled upon some utterly gay lyrics, durably archived here, extremely cliché and strange to think that this is Christian rock, it did made me wonder however…

It’s often asserted to be so that peers influence children and parents know better what’s good for children, but it’s still so that:

  • Parents are from a different age-group.
  • Parents are not to be chosen, friends are.
  • Parents have power over children, friends do not.

From this data alone, it’s quite reasonable to assume that indeed, friends of teenagers do know those teenagers a lot better than their respective parents. From this data it would be extremely exceptional for a parent to know better what is good for a child than a friend of that child. But parents are adults, and adults shape the rules, shape the moral. And from assertion they can put for that parents know better, as they are in the position to put forth.

Parents seem to often think with sublime confidence that they have the fullest grasp of what is good for their children, from assertion, not from arguments. Sure, they’ve known their children their whole lives. But that’s hardly a significant factor in human personality if you simply do not match. After all, the children have known the parents for an equal amount of time. Also, I fail to see how a more advanced age really puts one in an advantage in these matters. Aren’t children less rusted in ideas, more able to adapt their mind, more flexible, more open to new ideas?

When such a situation as in those lyrics could be put forth. I’m actually not surprise that the first person might be right as stupid and selling-material those lyrics are. Friends most likely know their friends better than their parents do. What teenager after all tells parents the intimate details friends get to hear? But adults make the rules so they give themselves the power and spread propaganda that parents know best. Propaganda spread by parents… Stalin incarnate.

That different parents seem to come with vastly different ideas of similar children but their peers’ ideas are more homogeneous should probably be an indication of at least the lack of professionalism in the parents’ ‘expert opinion’ over that of peers… the essential rule, if expert opinions diverge a lot, they are hardly a manifestion of expertise.