nihil architecture blogs

content

Multiculturalism

Kind of like the idea of multiculturalism, this is for a very simple reason.

Dutch food sucks.

Let me introduce you to the finest intricacies of Dutch cuisine:

Aardappelen met Vlees en Groente:

Aardappelen met Vlees en Groente

This quite literaly translates to ‘Patatoes with meat and vegitables’, our naming convention is as creative as our kitchen. If you think this is just præpairing vegitibles, meat and patatoes and putting them on a plate together, you are correct. If you were to ask if any of this has but any seasoning, I am inclined to answer with a negative. A meal fit for a Jewish king in Auswitch, next:

Boerenkool met Worst:

Boerenkool met Worst

Translates to ‘Farmer’s Cabbage with Sausage’, this is just destroying some cabbage to a pulp with some kind of squashing device and then putting a sausage next to it which may optionally, like here,  resemble together some kind of wretched phallic symbol. More often than not, the sausage is just laid next to it. If you were to ask a patriot here if this has but any taste you would get some-thing like ‘Taste in food? How dare you, this is treason to Her Majesty, The Queen, Beatrix of the Netherlands, go away to your own country if you want to eat the derangedness of food which has taste…’, next on we have:

Joods vlees

If you at this point realized that Dutch food is mostly just lumping various articles extracted from nature together which you’ve heated on one plate with no internal cohesion or thought, then you have paid attention. This fine abomination here is another traditional Dutch dish. Now, compare to a random dish brought into this country by some children of Attatürk:

Döner Kebab:

Döner Kebab

Or

Hot Pot, from China:

Hot Pot

Roti, from Suriname:

Surinaamse Roti

I should add that Surinamese Roti is a bit different from the Hindustani one often appreciated in the Anglician world.

I think I’ve made my point quite adequately, and if some Imam does not want to shake the hand of a woman, who cares, I don’t shake hands at all and every-one forgives me because I don’t wear a beard and a turban.

Free software

Politics
,
2009/1/04, 04:26

Richard Stallman, honestly one of the few people that have an en.wikipedia page to whom sincerely look up to and respect for political views and as far as an article there allows one to make a view thereon, also as a person. The way he lives, how what he stands for, his endless quest for perfection in terminology and what he strives to achieve.

He just hasn’t achieved it yet.

Fanboys of  GNU/Linux systems can become a bit obnoxious at time. Yes, GNU/Linux and other UNIX-like Systems serve their purpose and are the best there is in a certain field. A lot of people seem to forget that they don’t work properly in a lot of fields as well. The general ‘Ah good, you use Linux’ or ‘Get Linux’ after receiving a CTCP on IRC are just reaking of noviceness in general, or the people continuing their support for GNU/Linux while they cannot answer the critical questions regarding what exactly makes it better than Mac OS X, they tend to call it ‘Linux’ instead of ‘GNU/Linux’ too. I doubt the operating system would be significantly different if the Kernel was some-thing else too. The significant part of the system is the GNU part. It just doesn’t use Hurd as a kernel. They could try first taking into consideration what exactly the other party does with a machine before automatically assuming GNU/LInux is the best for every-thing, thinking that is just fanboyism. I personally tend to need professional graphics editing and audio editing tools. GNU/Linux doesn’t quite support these, or more like the reverse.

And then people come with ‘open source alternatives’, I just said professional, The GNU Image Manipulation Program is a completely unprofessional tool, it’s a toy to fool around with and desaturate your pictures of some sorts. It by no means meets the demands for a graphics designer, Photoshop 1.0 was better than The GIMP is today. And then people tell you you ‘need to be creative’ and then it becomes quite obvious that they are not graphics artists and when you ask them questions it turned out they didn’t know the capabilities of Photoshop by a vast margin. The people suggesting The GIMP comes close or even equal to Photoshop are extremely novice graphics artist and have very little sense of æsthetics, which probably is what the average GNU/LInux user is. And that’s probably why creative software on the platform is greatly insufficient but other things like CGG, Emacs, and LaTeX are not. And the last one is known for its ‘æsthetics are irrelevant’ policy. Have you ever seen the GNU site or Linux.org? Firepages? W3C.org?

Creative software isn’t really high on the GNU’s priority list I suppose is the cause of this, that, or they  themselves don’t realize the improvements it still requires. In that I have a Vista/Linuxmint dual boot, which isn’t because Windows is any great of an OS, it’s more because of the third party availability of commercial software which is largely simply because of the popularity of the platform. But still, it is how it is. Also, it has to be said that various stable builds of GNU/LInux distributions have bugs in them which would be unacceptable on commercial software, such as that it doesn’t suport turning of your speakers if you plug in your headphones which is a ‘known problem’ on various SUSE versions; that some Ubuntu versions where known to not even install at all on a lot of hardware configutarions, some solved the problem by anally raping your computer with an USB stick while you boot from CD, and no one knew why but it worked in some cases. On the other hand, Windows keeps having the very annoying bug that for instance a .jpg file being put on your drive can run itself as a binary executable in disguise, also known as virus. People that think Mac OS X and Unixen can’t get a virus is because of the obscurity of the software.. errhh. It’s essentially extremely strange that Windows can get virus, it’s a bug that files can just run themselves due to exploits in file-systems and what-not. And it still hasn’t been fixed, I reckon they can fix it. But just think about it, do you know any other things from MacAffee and Norton but virus scanner? I wouldn’t be that surprised if they paypal a huge sum to Bill Gates every year so that Microsoft doesn’t put them out of business by making their OS a little more resiliant against a flue. But ask yourself these questions:

  • Why is an OS good on which generally software you install doesn’t work the way it should unless you google a solution which more often than not requires you to sudo a couple of text files in which an error can cause your box to boom?
  • Why is an OS good which has an extremely limited availability of third party software?
  • Why is an OS good on which bugs such as not being able to install at al or being unable to properly direct hardware is a ‘known feature’ in stable builds?
  • Why is an OS good which requires extremely complicated procedures to get external hardware working like USB flash memory, SD card readers, portal MP3 players, and even if you get it to work it still lacks many features?

Try being objective about Stallman’s dream please. He has far from achieved it yet and the various stables could better be called GNU/Linux beta releases. They aren’t full fledged operating systems as of yet and have too many bugs and support issues for that. But I like the idea and support it, but also try to be realistic and down to earth about the feasibility of providing a good product free of charge and complete insight to company secrets. Though it’d be wonderful if he one day manages to achieve it.

I am by the way against all forms of intellectual property, thither my consistent Creative Commons tags.

Conter-intuitiveness.. it’s so hard to get.

science
, ,
2008/12/30, 22:14

Counter-intuitiveness, the state of a situation where your gut feeling or ‘intuition’ says some-thing which is directly contradicted by rational and/or scientific arguments. One is said to be able to deal with counter-intuitiveness when one is able to let the rational arguments take præcedence over the intuition, most people cannot.

Dec 30 20:44:58 <Lajla>    Leik ehh.
Dec 30 20:45:05 <Lajla>    I want this CD.
Dec 30 20:45:10 <PFA>    do you come here often?
Dec 30 20:45:14 <Lajla>    But the catalogue of that label is in a .doc format.
Dec 30 20:45:37 <Lajla>    And I don’t have some-thing which can read .doc…
Dec 30 20:45:43 <Lajla>    And just for the second time.
Dec 30 20:45:48 <Lajla>    I forgot the adres.
Dec 30 20:45:50 <PFA>    ah, i see
Dec 30 20:46:06 <PFA>    Lajla: http://www.doc2pdf.net/
Dec 30 20:46:07 <flawd>    Lajla: openoffice is free and can read doc
Dec 30 20:46:11 <flawd>    or that
Dec 30 20:47:03 <Lajla>    I don’t have openoffice either.
Dec 30 20:47:14 <Lajla>    I don’t really use rich text.
Dec 30 20:47:15 <PFA>    then use the site i just linked you
Dec 30 20:47:18 <Lajla>    Plain text or hypertext, mostly.
Dec 30 20:47:31 <Lajla>    Well, it’s more an idea of principe.
Dec 30 20:47:50 <Lajla>    I mailed the label that they are most likely homosexual and ingaging in Scheiß-fests.
Dec 30 20:47:55 <Lajla>    Scheiße*
Dec 30 20:48:01 <Lajla>    engaging*
Dec 30 20:48:02 <Lajla>    No awi
Dec 30 20:48:04 <Lajla>    wai*
Dec 30 20:48:10 <Lajla>    Godvrdomme.
Dec 30 20:48:55 <PFA>    yeah, you know, that’s true
Dec 30 20:49:09 <PFA>    every time i save in .doc format i suddenly get this massive urge to shit in a cup and find a girl to make out with
Dec 30 20:49:16 <flawd>    Nothing wrong with being homosexual
Dec 30 20:49:18 <layne>    watch it
Dec 30 20:49:20 <layne>    seriously
Dec 30 20:49:24 *    layne has quit (Quit: leaving)
Dec 30 20:49:49 <PFA>    i’m pretty sure Lajla is bi or something, flawd, or at least has no problems with alternative sexualities. he’s probably being facetious
Dec 30 20:50:07 *    flawd nods
Dec 30 20:50:34 *    layne (~layne@localhost) has joined #asbs
Dec 30 20:50:35 *    ChanServ sets mode +q #asbs layne
Dec 30 20:50:35 *    ChanServ gives channel operator status to layne
Dec 30 20:50:46 <flawd>    wb
Dec 30 20:50:57 <flawd>    going to the grocerystore, bbs
Dec 30 20:51:00 <layne>    vpn’d in to my home network and lost conn
Dec 30 20:51:31 <Lajla>    Yah, I’m certainly not ’straight’.
Dec 30 20:51:40 <Lajla>    It’s just a German label.
Dec 30 20:52:09 <Lajla>    Engaging in Scheiße-fests is nothing wrong with either.
Dec 30 20:52:45 <layne>    don’t talk about your shit fests in here please
Dec 30 20:56:17 <Lajla>    And about homosexuality?
Dec 30 20:56:50 <layne>    that’s fine
Dec 30 20:57:06 <layne>    as long as we aren’t getting graphic details of things be it hetero or homo
Dec 30 20:57:50 <Lajla>    Some.. more than 80% of the world I’d reckon would consider two men kissing to be highly graphic if not offensive / immoral though.
Dec 30 20:58:19 <layne>    that’s alright, we don’t go by that 80% of the world
Dec 30 20:59:20 <Lajla>    You are going by the portion that considers people involved into various forms of coprophilia to be highly graphic if not offensive / immoral though.
Dec 30 21:00:41 <layne>    we aren’t here to talk about a shit fetish
Dec 30 21:00:53 <layne>    that’s not why this room is here
Dec 30 21:00:54 <jez>    ok im back :-)
Dec 30 21:00:59 <layne>    stop being a fucking smartass
Dec 30 21:01:05 <jez>    ive setup my worm-like creature (except it’s a meateater … cant stand those weakling herbivores)
Dec 30 21:01:08 <jez>    now pizza time :-)
Dec 30 21:02:16 <Lajla>    But this group is not to talk about homosexality, or Pizza? I’m just noting your bigotry here, think of this next time you talk to some-one with coprophilia and remember that person feels the same homosexuals felt 20 years ago. And think when you talk to some conservative Christian that said feels the same as you do now.
Dec 30 21:02:27 <Lajla>    I shall leave this joke now.
Dec 30 21:02:29 <Lajla>    Good luck.

The log above is a very clear example of a person not being able to deal with the counter-intuitive notion of that said’s view on coprophilia is not different than most people’s views on homosexuality thirty-odd years back. In fact, I’d reckon it to be likely that that person shared them would it be born thirty years sooner.

Jewel case [re-post due to database fuckup]

Seriously. Jewel cases are a joke, a joke, nothing more, a cheap business decision of labels, the end. Mass produced, impersonal ready-made packaging. Just print some inlays in standard format, and people still complain about CDr’s… at least they’re almost as good as the original for a lot cheaper. But jewel cases.. then you’re really just cutting costs to get a lot less, probably man-hours too, jewel cases can be easily ordered by some mass-production company, pressed CD’s in them, little booklet in them which offer you little choice. The difference:

In the custom cardboard fold, the artists probably had some creative input themselves, the jewel case next to it is by some Dutch band, you are a disgrace to het vaderland you hear me? And people complain about Moroccans in this country when there are still black metal outlets who style all they make in Dutch, except their promptly Scandinavian name ‘Öde’, which is probably a leftover from some cheap arse Scandinavian-fanboyism phase ‘Vinterriket’-style.. yeah… your Norwegian name ain’t lookin’ so hot now when you have to evade questions from interviewers eh? I own a lot from Vinterriket by the way in—indeed—jewel cases…

And come on, the day two weeks have passed by in which I have not received a jewel case that was damaged by mail I’ll eat my e-peen, it’s hard plastic, it’s not durable, it’s not designed to be first dumped into a box with all the other packages, then driven in a bag over the country to some airport, then endure turbulence in a plane and than the whole story in reverse, regardless how many bubble wrap. They are designed to be bought at records stores, gently being lifted out of the rack with your manipulative digits and carefully taken home to be stacked in your CD tower. They’re pussies, they can’t handle some rough usages, totally un-black metal ya know whattem sayin’? We all know black metal chicks are masochists who can take a beating, not these sluts. They weren’t designed to be ordered per mail order in the first place. I’ve long given up keeping them in good state, I’ll just replace them when it gets too bad because you can, that’s the beauty of mass-made impersonal shit though.

Stop the fucking jewel cases, they are a disgrace to your music and a fine example of how the ‘black metal scene’—regardless of how obscure you might be, like De Tenetrarum Principio (Correct Latin grammar though, no way), Insinkt, and Total Holocaust Records—in the end still has evolved from a bunch of beer drinking savage metallers who came from some Beatles-listening pop music swine. A lot of these bands still list the contributing members based on what instrument they play… Jesus Christ. That many times I have simply not bought some-thing because of the thought ’sight.. again a jewel case, grow up.’, this problem seems to be solely a problem of the ‘black metal scene’ luckily.. well and all other forms of cheap arse pop music… my Kwoon CD is also in a jewel case but those I’ll just forgive. But the pain of that my entire Trancelike Void, Trist, Vinterriket, and what-not collection came in some-thing made of hard plastic laden with cracks, had some cracks when I opened the package in no small amount of the items. Take an example of Cyclic Law, all releases in custom made carboard folds, or that one release I just pre-ordered from Like Drone Razors Through Flesh Sphere, they’re pretty secretive about how it will look, but it’s 20 ltd. and all items are hand-crafted by the master himself and from what they do tell us it will look pretty elaborate. Takes some man-hours indeed. Take some dignity and respect for your music and say no to jewel cases. ‘black metal labels’ are usually pretty strange any-way.

Niner

Those favouring low-intellectual, ludicrously taste-defunct bullshit as The Next Generation, Star Trek “Seven of Nine” Voyager and The Original Series, undeniably your taste is of heniously low a level. So low in fact that would the Great Guide of the Third Empire still be alive, he would send you to a good and merry place to learn that working creates freedom, also he would perform some obscure medical experiments on you to see if you and your twin were stitched together sans anæsthetica, would you two magically turn into a siamese monstrosity belowman limiting the growth and grandiose of the Third Empire.

It is obviously apparent to any person with a taste adequate enough to resemble my own in some faint ways that Star Trek: Deep Space Nine is largely and without doubt the best product the franchise, which has lately turned Kirk into a boyband singer, had to offer thus far. Come on, even triëpisodal (word from now on, live with it) characters like Luther Sloan in Deep Space Nine had more character development than even Data—being the only character from The Next Generation one can even notice from if the episodes are aired in arbirtrary order. Gene was a sentimental bitch who probably disapproved of the merciless inhumane mistreatment of Jews during the holocaust too, priorities are essential for a growing Germanic Reich. The moral infallibility of the cast of The Next Generation just reeks of Lord of the Rings, they’re not human any-more, especially Data, live with it bitch, you’re not human, you’re a third class citizen, your penis is made of sillicone flesh, never will a girl dig a low class citizen like you. Deep Space Nine didn’t have ‘good / evil’, the characters were along a line, some of the main characters—as obfuscated that term in DS9 is any-way—also had questionable moral traits. Gul Dukat, maybe a villain? Who knows, some-times an ally, also with his human traits, in the end partly misunderstood (emo), maybe even a deluded tragic hero fighting for the wrong cause, portrayed as still giving up his career for his interracial daughter. Not even Great Hitler would do that eh? And Garak of course, you’d never know if he was the ally or not, you could until the end just see him having been a spy in the lengthily arc of the seven seasons all along. Both ‘recurring’ Cardassians having a far more realistic and complicated personality than the shallow characters of The Next Generation ever had. So many recurring characters taking the lead in so many episode. Garak was perhaps the main focus of the show for some seasons; the lengthily story arcs, the profound implications of all they did being addressed later. The rich world, the moral conflicts, the humanity of the characters of both sides.

The Prophets were a great asset too to the otherwise “”"”scientific”"”" Star Trek (for some reason people still don’t realize you don’t have to keep your impulse engines on if you go through a medium with no resistance, also, if you keep them on you keep accelarating, seeing that they reach eighty per cent of the speed of light in mere seconds according to the manual…), the mystical non-linear godlike nature of them, defying all normal physics, the prophecies, the orbs, the battle against Kosst Amojan. People who fail to realize that this is objectively superior to some stupid battle against the Borg at Wolf 359 obviously have some scary mental disorder which also manifests symptoms like believing Jews are actually human and girls below nine years old don’t crave anal sex, delusionate, go see a shrink, and if you don’t see you’re delusionate that means you’re even more.

And Quark, a main character (because it’s stated so really) but you never know if he’s the bad guy or not, morally dubious, above the law in a way, yet still friends with some of the cast, but not all, the cast doesn’t get along with every other person in the cast, it’s a directed graph. Bashir and O’Brien are obviouly brokebackmountaining off screen, Kira kind of openly hates Quark and has a fetish for strange partly translucent goos, sick girl. Odo and Quark’s bond is most intriguing, he really kind of sees him as a friend regardless of Quark being a borderline criminal. Not to mention kind of a ridiculously hypersexist capitalist, freaky disturbed people, forcing women to be nude when they look like that? Also, it rains like hell on that planet, cut them some slack. Naturally, the bond between Bashir and Garak is most intricate, are they friends? maybe they are. Do they trust each other? obviously not. Besides, again a ‘recurring’ character having a more interesting and plotwise-crucial backstory than any main character in any other Franchise ever had. When Jadzia thought she didn’t earn enough Latinum (It’s just a region close to Rome you know) and went all emo and committed suicide and wrote an emo title song ‘Tears of the Prophets’ for it, they should have made Garak a main cast member and just port Ezri to the ‘recurring’ characters. Ezri was also a splendid action, a bloody reverse-Seven of Nine, trade the shallow and cheaply attractive bold woman for the insecure and cute girl with short hair. If only Jadzia had thrice the net value of boobs combined with the obligatory spandex suit just so we noticed more it would be complete. If you cannot see why this is good, I contend you have been fucked in your eye socket one time to many, a good tip is to re-use the same one every time by the way, loosing stereoscopic vision is a small price to pay for living out your derangedly obscure hot fetishes.

Also, the abundance of recurring-but-actually-main-cast characters made it quite easy to have some play with the main cast without having to adjust the format extensively. Characters like Vic Fontain and Nog—who had a whole episode devoted to their bond together—gaining extensive screentime during the final seasons. Naturally Garak, the recurring character who, rightfully for a change, is the absolute popular favourite of the show and symbol of what DS9 is and of course Kai Winn, being most instrumental in the final episode. Damar, Dukat, Weyoun 8, The Female Changeling, Weyoun 6, Weyoun 7,  that random figurating redshirt I and no-one remembers and of course Weyoun 5.

Favourite characters: Garak (obviously), Gul Dukat, Bashir, Ezri Dax, Vic Fontaine

Favourite plot elements: The Emissary of the Prophets, a large part civilian cast, the past of Garak, the moral struggly, the story arcs.

Favourite reverse-Seven-of-Nine: Ezri Dax.

Favourite badarse food: Gagh, Kanar, Bajorans in general.

Be convinced, woman, or I so hope both, like Sofie. <3

You don’t understand, me neither

On a rather dubious site, I was entering ‘debate’ with some-one who was apparently a linguist, not only that, but also a linguist who not only claimed that a spelling standard regulated by an official body was ‘descriptive linguistics’, but also a spelling standard which differentiated two words which were phonetically equal as much as phonemically and simply spelt differently per etymology, which is also a regular process of a lot of similar couples in the language we spoke of, and also a spelling standard which is most notoriously wrongly applied even by adults in spoken of language, even after many months she still claims it’s descriptive linguistics with absurd arguments, also, she doesn’t like me. I’m talking about the ‘dt-rule’ in Dutch by the way. If you are a linguist, please tell her she sucks (cataclysm__child at hotm4il dot common extention) with my compliments. In fact, you don’t have to be a linguist, any-one who know the definition of ‘descriptive linguistics’ can just mail her and argue why she’s wrong, I’m against the argument of authority.

However that is completely irrelevant to the article actually and I’ll leave in the middle if I just wrote it as an excuse to rant on Nele, which actually is a pretty beautiful name I would name my daughter like that. The point is I had a debate with her which started about creationism and then ventured into scientific rigour. She continually accused me of not ‘understanding’ philosophy as I attacked Captain Moustache on flaws in reasoning like you’d never seen it. What also happened was that she said some things about the imperfection of maths such as ‘Mathematics has unproven theorems’.. yeah. That was the first thing she said. So I simply assumed she applied some terms wrongly, that’s a contradictio in terminis I fear, you can only call a statement a theorem after it’s proven, that’s the definition of a theorem. So I pointed that out and asked what she meant to get back not only some-thing which indicated that she just read a dubious article about it and didn’t understand shit what she was talking about. But also some clear errors she made which I pointed out. That’s the vital difference, I pointed out her errors, I could point them out and then I claimed she didn’t know or understand the process behind mathematical reasoning at all and suggested she stop talking about it as she made a complete fool of herself. How-ever after asking a lot of times ‘Yes, what am I misunderstanding about philosophy then, where do I err?’ she couldn’t give me any concrete examples, she just kept claiming I didn’t understand it regardless of that she couldn’t extract an error in reasoning or some factual data I stated wrongly about the subject.

Which sadly happens rather often. That people insist you are ‘wrong’ without them being able to show the point where you are wrong, which is just annoying. The same thing happens a lot of times in art. ‘You don’t understand art.’ How could you ‘understand’ art in the first place? You could agree with people who think they understand it, that’s as close as you can get. It’s a sum of opinions, studying art and having discourse about it. Same with continental philosphy like Nietzsche, I mean, come on, it’s formally just popular literature he wrote. He wrote it for laymen to read, people with no education in any scientific field ought to be able to understand it assuming ‘common knowledge’ as prærequisits and therefrom it is popular literature by definition. How people think of themselves as ‘intelectual’ by reading that or Nietzch is called a ‘thinker’ is beyond me.

This article sucks, next time a good old holocaust post, now go tell Nele why she’s wrong with my compliments, don’t just tell her she sucks, give arguments. Nahh, just forgot about it, I’ve given all the arguments I can, repeating an argument doesn’t make it more valid, no argumentanda ad nauseam please.

Blasphemy

society
, , , ,
2008/11/10, 06:10

Definition: Blasphemy. The act of stating an opinion extremely little people agree with in your sphære.

Annō 1327, people tended to get burnt at the stake for being blasphemous. Saying unthinkable things like that the earth wasn’t the centre of the universe or that The Roman Catholic Church wasn’t badarse or perhaps that the pope had an affair with his mistress to name some things. How right or wrong these people might have been, no difference it made for they were blasphemous, they went against what every-one thought, a crime in itself, punished for that they were rightfully, often in name of Our Father Which beth in heaven, hallowed be His name. Justice was forced unto them, these hounds. Luckily that barbarian shit doesn’t happen any-more though…

Think. Again.

It happens alright, and not just in some middle-eastern client state. It happens in the west in no uncertain terms, point being is that people tend to not notice it when they themselves are the inquisition here. Every-day example: ‘Kid says of a guest of his mummy that that guest dresses like a whore after watching too much MTV, kid gets punished. The end, and rightfully so indeed.’, is there any argument the mother can give for that such behaviour cannot come to pass than simply ‘It cannot.’, does the mother even realize the only reason she thinks such behaviour may not occur is because her mother also conditioned her via equal ways of that it’s ‘wrong’, it’s a vicious circle of conditioning here in Pavlovian manners, punish a child when-ever it does some-thing, can be any-thing. And the child will then perceive that as wrong. If I randomly decide to punish my children every time they don’t hate Jews, they will grow up hating them and also telling their children to do the same, simple example being the Westboro Baptist Church of course of that this indeed works, it’s a reason it’s a family. That’s were all your vaunted morals you believe in come from, from being conditioned as a child. And then you have people saying ‘But yes, these are the right morals’…

……….

What the deus? How can it happen that so many humans put forth that argument? Of course they just think those morals are ‘right’ because they are conditioned therein, there is no such as ‘right morals’… Westborans think the same of their own morals, every-one thinks that around the globe no matter how diverse they are just because they are brought up (read: conditioned) with them, you’re extremely arrogant as a human to just think yours are ‘right’ without being able to provide an argument thereto.

Racism, we all hate it, if a person in this country just says ‘I think black people are inferior’ with no arguments given, that person is pretty evil. What does that person actually say any-way…

For sake of argument we here take two of the most vauntedly overrated, ignorantly fabled renaissance artworks. The Mona Lisa of Leonardo, and the David of Michelangelo, almost as fabled as the ninzyatô of Leonardo and the nuntyaku of Michelangelo respectively. Let us say I consider the Mona Lisa ’superior’ because of its better realism to the David because it’s just pompous and undeniably homosexual, probably even liking diphallic men.. that’s just my opinion then on what I value in art. In fact, saying one thing is superior to an-other always is nothing more than simply stating what qualities in things you think matter. Now, because some people consider the Mona Lisa better, and some the David better, and the largest portion the ninzyatô better, I can get away with this. Namely, it is not blasphemy because I don’t disagree with every-one.

Saying ‘black people are inferior’ is little more than stating you think white skin colour is extremely important a quality of people, that’s your opinion then, free to choose what you value in people I daresay. But no one thinks that and then you have formally performed blasphemy, and punished you shall be thereon. If you say you consider tall people to be ’superior’ that has a lot more sympathy to just state, as you’re not disagreeing with every-one. Saying men are superior is again blasphemy as hardly any person thinks gender is significant a quality to judge people on. It’s clearly shown throughout history, when every-one thought indeed that black people were inferior, you performed blasphemy by denying it and were put to justice appropriately. As the ballance shifted in the renaissance stupid white men of either side were not put to justice but respected in their opinion as none of them performed blasphemy, however now the balance has completely flipped and it’s again blasphemy to say black people are inferior you shall be punished for performing blasphemy, as always.

Moralists…

Open letter to the ‘Neofolk Against Racism’-last.fm group

society
, , ,
2008/11/09, 21:03

Originally written on last.fm, to be viewed in original context [here].

1: I myself am vehemently against common racism.
2: This is formally criticism on this very last.fm group.

All right, if one looks at the intro of that group, we see their stance against racism. Only at no single point do they argue why racism is ‘bad’, it’s a self-evident truth for them. This is how most people think, in fact, laws are made upon it, and never has any person tried to argue why racism is ‘bad’. It’s just a self-evident truth no one dares to question in western society.

You get in trouble in this country for racist outlets in public, and no one takes the effort of arguing nor explaining why racism is a ‘bad’ think. This is just the same as the inquisition, blasphemy about God in inherently bad and you will be punished for it and arguments to why it’s bad we will not give, it’s just not-done.

Of course we are inclined to believe that racism is inherently ‘bad’, just as the inquisition was inclined to believe blasphemy was inherently ‘bad’, and just as people were inclined to believe without arguments that letting women vote is inherently bad. And just as people have believed videogames are bad for children which has now shown to not be true. Or more recently, how RSI is caused which turns out to be unrelated to how much time you spend behind the computer, people just assumed it without arguments… can we for once learn from our past mistakes?

No, we can’t. That’s the problem with humanity, it’s inability to learn from past mistakes which are in a trendy new coat and thereto different from the untrained eye, but in fact of a logically equivalent form. Every-time people will say ‘It’s different now.’ and not being able to argue why. Now I hope you realize the inquisition felt when they burnt people at the stake which you find hard to comprehend why probably. They felt exactly about how you feel what should happen to Nazis, and said Nazis feel the same as the people burnt at the stake, misunderstood, there isn’t listened to them, people assume they are wrong from the moment on they say they are Nazi.

Of course, it’s true a large deal the things Nazi say simple aren’t true from a scientific perspective, of course the holocaust happened, thereto can be argued. Of course being black isn’t infectious or some-thing, thereto we can argue. However when they say black people are ‘inferior’, that is strictly an opinion. It’s like attacking some-one on that said person doesn’t like the Mona Lisa as much as the David and you like them in reverse order.. really, what race is better is a personal opinion. Also, as a quick reminder. We can logically argue to that the concept of ’species’ cannot exist via the reductio ad absurdum. And biology still desperately holds on to it.. Also, denying the holocaust is über bad while the majority of the world still doesn’t believe in evolution? Get real.. we have more urgent matters at hand.

Also, a lot of time, scientific truth is withheld for the sake of it appearing racist. Yes, there are genetic differences in the averages of capabilities of races. Yes, Asians are genetically smarter than all the other races, and yes, African races have the most physical endurance/stamina. This has long been shown by good, reproducible scientific investigations. In fact, it would be highly unlikely that there wouldn’t be a correlation in races with abilities on about every point, we are free to acknowledge some dog breeds are simply better fit for running courses but not this? Come one, there would be a complex system which has a unstable property which would be in equilibrium if all races were alike on all capabilities. That’s comparable to dropping a cone from a skyscraper in heavy wind. Watching it make hundreds of twists and have it fall on the street on its tip and stay in balance.

However, we must take importance in that we cannot calculate the mechanisms behind why some races outdo others in certain fields. We cannot predict a complex system. It’s chaos theory, we can’t calculate if we drop a cone to which side it will fall. We can measure to which side it falls if we stand on the bottom of the scraper.

But, I’m against judging people on races because it’s a correlation, not an absolute scale. And the problem people have in this is that they tend to classify people into three categories subconsciously: Race, Gender, Age. It’s extremely obvious, all laws are based on it. Even positive discrimination, like the effort of getting as much females as males into high positions. Because people immediately notice if some-one is male or female, and not for instance length.. people in high positions are averagely taller… but people don’t classify in length, so no laws are made to get the mean people in high positions on average length. People class in races, we can put forth a thousand of classes in which correlations emerge, why pick race specifically of all? People think in races subconsciously.. that while races is a continuous scale even, just like species.

This journal has been submitted to the group, I hope they can take some criticism and allow it.

Pseudoscience I

Theorem: Biology is a pseudoscience
Proof: Biology does not offer proofs or if it does does as stupidly as this little ‘proof’ here.

One of the most dire things wrong with this ‘proof’ is that it lacks a definition of ‘pseudoscience’. In order to define pseuoscience, let me first give an informal definition of the scientific method as used in this article:

Any form of deduction which is:

  1. Objective, any scientist at any time and any place and from any culture most come to the exact same results from the same set of data.
  2. Not contradictory to classical logic, the propositions derived in science may not be proven false in logic, however they do not necessarily have to be proven true, as in experimental results.
  3. Investigative, scientific deduction is to investigate what is true, not trying to prove certain things true.

With the occasional slips, biology remains largely innocent of malperformance on point 1 and 2. However on point 3 they fail graciously. Let’s examine some of their slips:

Species

Biology postulates the existence of the concept of ’species’, which is commonly explained as ‘Two individual forms of life who can produce fertile offspring together if and only if in the same species.’ this isn’t even a definition of the concept of species and what is an ‘individual form of life’ isn’t even defined. Is an ant-hill one invidual or not, that is the question? But we need no more to quite simply show the concept of species cannot exist. Using the argument of clines.

A cline in biology is simply a group of related organismes diverge continually over a large area. Its inhabitants can most likely produce fertile offspring with its neighbours, and the whole street. But not much further than that, and this applies for every inhabitant of the cline. Assume members x,y,z in a random cline X. It occurs that x can produce fertile offspring with y, and y with z, but x not with z. x is then of the same species as y and y likewise with z, since in biology. An individual can only belong to one species. We may conclude that x is of the same species with z. But x cannot procreate with z we first established, so it’s also not of the same species. A contradiction to with what we started. Q.E.D. the concept of ’species’ cannot exist. And of course, given with that biology has shown continuous evolution of species and common ancestors, we may also conclude that the Mushrooms I have on my Pizza are in fact of the same species as I. Cannibalism is tr00 kids.

Diseases

Biology seems to postulate the existence of ‘diseases’, what are they? I’ve yet to read a good definition thereof, some common once we encounter. ‘Every-thing that is substantially different from normal’. Assuming we can take averages in some-thing as complex as ‘life’. How much is ’substantially’ then? Are extremely intelligent people born with a disease? Extremely pretty people? Furthermore. It’s probably extremely rare for all people to be in the room you read this in right now, it’s a disease to be in your room…

So let’s sharpen that definition to ‘Every-thing that is substantially different from normal which causes a disadvantage to the organism’. Like being on a deserted Island, that’s disease now.. and still being exceptionally intelligent. Or being homosexual in Iran, or wait was a disease.. or wait, it’s not.. or is it? Yeah… we haven’t even been able to define what we mean with ‘disadvantage’ by the way.

On that homosexuality issue, DSM used to consider a disease.. not any more, and now people get offended if you call it a disease… what the hell, first get a good working definition of disease, then prove them wrong and get angry at them. It’s like getting angry at some-one for not liking the Mona Lisa… also, calling people with Autism, Depression or whatelse mentally ill is still politically correct to do it seems. Psychiatry seems to fail at point 1 here, not objective, clearly they are influenced by culture.

Life itself..?

The entire fundament of biology, the existence of the elusive concept of ‘Life’, the very start. And they still can’t show there exists such a thing in the first place. Namely, they can’t define it. Every definition they try ends up with unwanted stuff like mules not being life, or fire being life. Give up, admit it, there is no distinction between lifeless and dead matter. It’s such a naïve distinction you cannot make into a scientific one. Seriously, biologists are amateurs, never have they made a valid logical step and a complete idiot like myself can use valid informal logic to prove them wrong. Oh boy.

[further reading]

Stars Wars

This has to be the single most overrated fake-nerdery into human history, this is not limited to the often-hated-by-true-oldschool-peeps prequel. This includes the entire franchise except the LEGO® toys, how can this piece of fabled popular entertainment be asociated with nerd culture any-way, because it’s about space and fantasy? Please, that’s saying what led George II of America to concluding Iraq has Weapons of Mass Destruction was nerd-reasoning.

The entire idea of the show sucks, not the concepts, at that time it was pretty original to add some sort of arcane magic to space. The whole structure of the films itself. The idea of the classical dauntless hero who screams ‘NOOOOOOOOO’ when an old man he barely know who caused his uncle he loves dearly dead gets sliced in ha.. err. what-ever that had to be special effects coundsn’t accomplish in those times. The classical hero, throwing himself into the depths rather than speaking to his father about ruling the galaxy and maybe setting some things straight. He couldv’e just say ‘No.’ instead of trying to kill himself in the way his haircut in that scene implied. Fearless, without flaw, the protagonist out to at what-ever cost help his friends and his oppressed people. These characters are as depthless as any Lord of the Rings character, the only characters showing slight moral complexity were of course Darth Vader himself and Han Solo.. who didn’t shoot first in the end after all. But the ‘Go.. my son.’ really is too much like ‘Fly, you fools!’.

And after that comes the ridiculously far-sought inconceivably unrealistic plot devises. ‘I have the high ground.’ – ‘You uderestimate my power.’, firstly it’s highly inconceivable it makes but any sense that that is such a dire strategic advantage, secondly why not just make a little jump to the shore you can do without force and then just walk up there? Also, in that entire epic battle no one thought of just using a force push at any time and sending the other into the lava? And what the deus, how Anakin got sliced, that’s the exact move Obi-Wan performed upon Darth Maul in Episode I, which has the fitting, fitting title ‘The Phantom Menace.’, or Darth Vader ‘I must face him alone… no reason, just have to.’, also, Luke throwing his lightsabre away with Sidious and Vader in the same room with him.. at least keep a defence while making a dramatic posture… well, it did ultimately lead to the redemption of Anakin… in the most clichéd fashion ever, nonetheless, redemption.

Also, George Lucas has been trying really hard to spread the myth he wrote all six.. or even nine films in advance. Bullcrap, he intended IV to be a standalone film, when IV was the cinemae, he probably hadn’t even come up with making Darth Vader Luke’s father, come one.. Obi-Wan Calls him ‘Darth’ as if it’s his first name, they really hadn’t established the rule of two back then. The guy was just called ‘Darth Vader’, Darth his given name, Vader his family name. Obviously Lucas intended Luke to end up with Leia in the most clichéd fashion ever, flirting him even while she thought he was a storm trooper.. luckily that cliché didn’t hold. Just port her to the the desert bandit Solo who found his true goal in the end too. Also, General Grevous being a technologically far more advanced cyborg than Vader, even though Vader’s desgin was built unto those technologies? Obviously Vader was designed first.
True nerd motion pictures, comics and series:

  • Serial Experiments Lain
  • BLAME/NOiSE
  • The Silver Surfer
  • Donnie Darko
  • Earth: Final Conflict
  • The Butterfly Effect

Most people will of most of these, especially Lain, BLAME and Darko say that they don’t even understand what’s going on.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »